top of page

Real Estate Purchase Commitment Contracts: Resolutive Clauses and Property Reversion


Real estate purchase commitment contracts are a common way to ensure the future transfer of ownership, allowing the buyer and seller to establish a preliminary agreement until all conditions are met. However, these contracts also allow for resolution, usually in cases of buyer default, such as non-payment.


In this context, applying resolutive clauses and the property reversion process to the seller requires careful handling, including calculating debts and credits between the parties, improvements made, property damages, and prolonged occupation by the buyer.


1. Resolutive Clause and Property Reversion


The resolutive clause is a contractual provision that allows the termination of the contract, returning ownership to the seller in the event of non-fulfillment of obligations, particularly payment. This clause grants the seller the right to demand the property back and cancel the sales promise, while respecting legal processes and, in some cases, setting compensation for the time the buyer remained in the property without fulfilling contractual conditions.


To ensure a fair property reversion, it is essential to consider the calculation of debts and credits, accounting for amounts paid up to the termination date, benefits from property occupation, and any potential damages to the asset.


2. Calculation of Debts and Credits


In the event of termination, calculating debts and credits between buyer and seller is essential to avoid unjust enrichment and ensure fair compensation. This calculation should consider the amounts paid by the buyer, property occupation, and any damages or improvements made.


For instance, if the buyer has occupied the property for an extended period, it may be fair to compensate the seller for this occupation, which may be deducted from the refund amount.


This calculation should also include reimbursement for any economic benefits derived from the property — such as income or economic uses — and compensation for material damages.


If the seller has received substantial value from the property's prolonged use, the amount paid by the buyer can be deducted based on a precise calculation.


3. Vacating and Returning the Property


Vacating is a necessary step for the effective reversion of ownership to the seller. After contract termination, the buyer must vacate the property, allowing the seller to regain possession. If the buyer resists, the seller may seek judicial assistance for possession recovery, ensuring prompt and peaceful property return.


To avoid conflicts, vacating should follow reasonable timelines and comply with contractual clauses or judicial determinations.


4. Improvements and Enhancements Made by the Buyer


A frequently controversial aspect of contract termination is compensation for improvements made by the buyer. In many cases, the buyer may have made enhancements to the property, increasing its value or adding useful features, as well as bearing mutual obligations, such as any damage caused by the buyer against the seller.


The law distinguishes between three types of improvements: necessary, useful, and luxury, and reimbursement to the buyer will depend on the type of improvement and their good faith or bad faith in making these enhancements. For necessary or useful improvements made in good faith, the buyer has the right to compensation, provided these enhancements add value to the property.


On the other hand, luxury improvements, which serve only decorative purposes, are generally not compensable. However, if the buyer acted in bad faith — that is, made improvements knowing they were in default or in breach of contractual clauses — they may lose the right to compensation and could even be required to remove the improvements or repair any damage caused.


Conclusion


The termination of a real estate purchase commitment goes beyond the simple repossession of the property by the seller. It requires a balance that ensures the rights and duties of both parties, considering the time of property occupation, improvements made, property damages, debt and credit calculations, and compliance with established contractual obligations.


The law provides compensation mechanisms for both parties, aiming for a fair and balanced outcome. Thus, the purchase commitment becomes a multifaceted contract that demands attention to resolutive clauses, the property usage history, and the parties' good faith conduct, especially in cases of default.


Protecting both parties under the contract terms is crucial to prevent abuse in real estate transactions and to guarantee rights and obligations in termination situations.

bottom of page